Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Imitation


My fingers are spider legs running across the keys
Begging for love from someone else’s clouded dreams
Eating the love and soulfulness of some else’s heart
Felling like if only, if only, I could find my part
In all this madness without purpose without
Meaning what do you mean by it,
Can I get a
Can I
But no, that’s not what I am because I am
Imitation
Only

Saturday, May 18, 2013

When Penny looks at the endless sea


When Penny looks at the endless sea
She wonders what it means to be
To live and love and care about
All those things within, and without

She wanders through the park at dawn
Looking for a love that’s gone
To see the world because he should
And she thinks, she never, understood

In that time the love is lost
Because to hold on there is a cost
One that only some can pay
To be a light for another day

Not as lucky as the special few
Some love is lame and mediocre too
Penny may cry, wish, and hold on tight
But pathetic is a lackluster fight

So as the sun tries to peak its head
The cold wind reminds of words once said,
‘Penny, I love you, but not in that special, infinite kind of way. That doesn’t exist. But I love you. I’m sorry if that’s not enough; it’s all there is. And, it’s not going to last forever, if very long at all. Can we just have fun as we are, in this moment? I’d like that…’

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Forgetting Myself and the Point of This Post

There is a time and a place for everything, as the cliche runs.  Is this true?  There are so many things that seem to be fairly useless or wholly detrimental, but they have their place?

The consciousness of our subjectivity places a difficult strain on personal realities.  So maybe I just can't see the purpose of certain things, or maybe 'everything' does not include everything.  Also, situational subjectivity makes it difficult to say the cliche works one way or the other.

More specifically, I wonder about selfishness.  You could say that its important to be selfish because it keeps us safe, healthy, and makes us successful, but is selfishness truly necessary to bring about these qualities?  Naturally we make sure we eat, stay warm, and keep clean (enough).  Is that selfishness, or is selfishness something else?  I feel that it requires a certain idea of self that coincides with desire which manifests or is thought of as a need.  But, at the end of the day, we don't even need to be happy or satisfied.  To be healthy we might need these among other desires, but we don't even need to be healthy necessarily to survive.  But then, is that it?  At the end all, is it just that we survive?

living vs thriving
I don't think so.  I mean, we can just survive, but when we look deeply at our "needs" what we find is that we have a drive that manifests as a need, to thrive.  Sometimes thriving looks different to different people.  This is where our selfishnesses differentiate and on some social level we decide which selfish actions are okay, and which are not.

So where does this leave us?  I don't know.  I have no insightful conclusion for this one.  But maybe an encouragement.  Maybe don't be "selfish", but most definitely go thrive in all the ways that you know how.  Happy trails.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Fighting for Love?

There's a phrase that goes 'love is hard', and I was once asked if I thought that was true.  Well, I don't, but I do think that people are difficult and complicated and awkward.  Which brings me back around to the idea that love is not hard, it's actually quite easy, but that people and honest connections are hard and difficult to understand.

This can quite often leave one individual of a couple or group standing aside and wondering what's going on here or where did I mess up or what are we now, now that we're not what/who we were when we started?  We don't look at each other and think, this is too hard because the other beside us is just downright difficult - unless there's a healthy scoop of denial involved - we look at each other and think, I love them, this, and us, but something is hard about all this, what?  And then we analyze.  And then we prioritize.  And then we compromise... or not. 

Maybe some love is worth fighting for and some is not.  Maybe we need to grow or are growing into something different and the best way to compromise is to let go.  Maybe we need to fight, because although it's not easy, it's real, and that is beautiful.  "There are as many different loves as there are hearts", (Tolstoy) and maybe there's an evolution that goes along with loving that needs to be respected, and that's hard.

What do you love today?  Is that love worth continual cultivation?  Can you accept the outcome of that growth?  If you let love stay stagnant, is that where resentment comes from?  Friends, family, lovers, strangers, acquaintances, we have so many people with whom to create and cultivate love, but can we do it graciously?  Because that is hard.

very impressive love plant

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Fortitude in Truth

   Individuals often have trouble being assertive or confrontational, resulting in an odd inability to say 'no' to almost anything.  No one wants to hurt feelings or disappoint another, so they either say 'yes' or 'maybe' as a sort of linguistical flight from the situation.  However, this dishonesty generally causes more trouble than would just saying 'no'.  If one is unavailable or disinterested there is nothing wrong with saying so.  Its much more of a hassle to encourage hope in a hopeless situation.  This also relates to the physical realm of action, which as we know, metaphorically, speaks louder than words.  If we can't act the part then the hope can be detrimental and there is no justice or righteousness that comes from going through the motions with your head and heart in another place.  Being true in word and deed, a classically chivalrous or courtly ideal that do not seem to have much presence in modern values, (I would say) can mean the world.  It's not always easy, and may sometimes seem harsh, but if we are truer to those around us, we become better for grand principle and honest love.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Forms of Assistance (part 2, action)

   Continuing from my un-read post about empathy, I persevere onto the kind of action that our ideal's should create.  They hardly ever do because, honestly, as lovely as ideals are, they are difficult to uphold and are therefore seemingly anti-human, which is then what defines them as ideals.  In any case, we will move to my current goal (which is close to an ideal, but not as elevated) of empathy towards love [inspired by amy winehouse's song "love is a losing game"].

   Empathy can be related to innumerable situations based on the idea that it relates to every experience, however when it comes to love (which is going to be my focus this evening because trying do empathy in the general sense is scary (and even trying to do just empathy and love is intense)) we can look at is as naive, romantic, stupid, perfect, or denialistic (among others).  However, we can also understand it as real (if you've ever believed you've been in love then you and I know that it's real [despite the cynicality I may use to perceive or present it]).  And, if we are taking the generous approach to other realities (such as sadness (which we already do)), then we should be able to appreciated the happiness of others as real, just as pain and loss are true.  Disbelieving happiness and love tends to be a consistent prerogative instead of appreciating and enjoying someone else's general good fortune.  More often we approach situations with a judgmental edge, which has to do with critical assessment as well, but this post is a call for using empathy instead of judgement in an honestly kind and understanding way.  How often do we get the opportunity to appreciate and relate within happiness and love?  Why should we only share our sorrows when there is happiness to be spread as well?

   But, this neglects the point that, as dumb as love may be, if we don't judge or be more cynical about ourselves, then we should let the lovers love and not pop their bubble because of our own (or my own) bitterness.  Now, I'm not sure that love can exist under true scrutiny, and I don't know that it would be anymore real even if it did, but this sort of just makes us think of how we judge and what love means in one fell swoop.  I want to break arrogance and move to a reality of connection between humanity. I believe that empathy is the key to this ideal of community and reality, essentially.  Empathy can connect us in the most basic sense of experience and within our individual interiority which we hold so dearly apart.  It's just a shift in ideals, but the problem is the action that needs to happen but is staved by fear.  All our troubles can be traced back to fear, but I don't know that's ever going to change...

For the Love of Empathy (part 1, realization)

   I know its been awhile, so I'm doing this in a two part set to give your lovely thoughts a buffet after the famine.  I want to start by looking into the ideas of sympathy and empathy.  Many people do not seem to understand these concepts in exact terms, especially in difference, so I will explain what each is and how they are important.  Firstly though I want to try a little paradigm shift with what you may perceive of these ideas.   It doesn't work as well with sympathy as it does empathy but, since language is a growing and changing conception, in theory, anything can have whatever meaning we assign, so here is the paradigm shift and my reconstruction of definition, or as I think is more apt, definition renovation.  Instead of looking at these words and imagining that they only apply to negative situations, think of them as relevant to the understanding of and connection with all scenarios.  We think of them generally in relation to pain or sorrow, but how much more can we understand and connect to each other if we realize the similarities of all our emotions and experiences.  It seems to lessen the ideals of individuality but reinforces the diminishing form of communities.  Personally I have a great deal of difficulty with ideas of community and a sort of extreme loss of control and space but, when thought about at a safe distance, it seems like a beneficially healthy pursuit.  I think its more us naturally than what we are on are own, but we never really look into to far, except for those we might label as extremists, and I think a large part of it, which is my consistent hang up, is that people really cannot be trusted fundamentally.  But, I have digressed and trust is a post for another day.  Back to sympathy and empathy.

   Sympathy and empathy are, with respect to my definition renovation, the way we relate to others.  Sympathy being the way we can relate to another person's scenario based on general themes of understanding and/or observational knowledge; (though if you look up the proper definition it will be less about how we relate and more on what we relate to, ie. pity and sorrow for another's misfortunes.  But, this is distracting to the point I'm trying to make ^_^).  Empathy, on the other hand, is the way we relate to each other with experiential knowledge and, what I would say is, a truer understanding.  We've both done it, or felt it (whatever 'it' may be) and, therefore, when we relate our situations there is a mutual understanding of the reality.

   I know that, for me, when someone empathizes with my situation I feel connected and solaced by that in a way that is properly true, and what we possibly are supposed to be, in relation to community and human connection, becomes. [I know that this vague and riddled with interpretation, but as an understanding of very limited and privileged sense of society its the best I can hope for in the general sense, and to me this is the core of what is important.]  Sympathy, however genuine, lacks actually understanding and is therefore nullified as meaningful, unfortunately.  Meaning, for everything, being the ultimate goal, makes it difficult to waste time on anything that doesn't relate, sadly.  But, now, to the point.

   The reason for this definition renovation, specifically, is that I find that there are multiple ways to empathize.  I have no patience for sympathy these days because the more experiences I have, along with the additional difficulties they present, the more meaningless the absence of real understanding becomes; however empathy, integrated into all situations, is quite powerful.  To be able to connect with someone else in a very organic sense provides many of the basic feelings that make us human and develops community (which as I've already said is (possibly) the natural state of humanity) and creates the actualities that separate us from other species.  But, I want to re-make the point that it does not have to only be a part of the negative form that it has been confined to for so long.  We can empathize with everything.  More specifically (again), being with falling in love.  [Falling in love and the realization of it as a conception will be coming soon,  but in the meantime, if you have never fallen in love you won't ever understand, and if you have you'll understand all too well.]

   Disney has provided us with ideals of love spanning a limited range, but at least its something.  However, as soon as you really look at people in love, and experience love yourself, you'll never realize how confusing and subjective it truly is.  And this is where empathy enters.  I have found that, though I have been in love, and that fact will never change even as my perceptions of love do, its better and more honest to empathize with lovers rather than judge their decisions within love; because, even if you've never done it, you've probably seen the idiocy of love.  I've done it, time and time again, but that, to me, allows me some more insight and wisdom/empathy in the subject to have a minimal say; but, lately that say has been less kind than I'd like to see, and here we fall into part two ^_^